Flowchart

Chronological Site Index

This website is a collection of step-by-step ethical reasoning procedures, taken from a variety of sources, that may prove useful to computer professionals engaged in ethical decision-making. Some of these procedures are examined in "Heuristic Methods for Computer Ethics," which will appear in final form Metaphilosophy, volume 33.

One of these may be a good match for a particular situation or, more likely, it will be necessary to combine elements from several. It is always possible that a good decision would emerge from a gestalt impression, without doing any step-by-step analysis, but it would be difficult to defend such a decision.

Although these procedures have possible limitations, they provide a fertile source of ideas and can reveal elements missing from the decision procedure you currently use. In addition, it is possible to map elements from these procedures into a uniform set of twelve stages.

An alphabetical webliography is available.

1978

Parker,
Scenario Analysis Methodology
Notable because it is the first use of scenario methodology in computer ethics

1981

Kohlberg,
Ethical Decision-making by Developmental Stages
Notable because it accords with research on moral development

Maner,
The Practicum Method
Notable because it defines the issue first, then creates a scenario to fit the issue

Nash,
Twelve Ethics Questions for Business Decision-makers
Notable for acknowledging that different parties may define the problem differently, for comparing intentions against likely consequences, and for considering the symbolic value of the decision

1985

Miller and Spielman,
Paramedic Method
Notable because it addresses the fact that professional ethicists may be unavailable for consultation

1987

Mathison,
Three-step Ethical Decision-making Model for Business Students
Notable for integrating ideals into the decision-making process

1989

McLaren,
A Strategy for Solving Moral Problems
Notable because it implements a "good reasons" approach to ethical decision-making

1990

Guy,
Guidelines for Making Simple Rational Decisions
Notable because simple ethical decision-making can be regarded as a special case of simple rational decision-making

Guy,
Guidelines for Making Complex Rational Decisions
Notable because complex ethical decision-making can be regarded as a special case of complex rational decision-making

Guy,
Guidelines for Making Ethical Decisions
Notable because it is a specialization of a general method for rational decision-making

Hastings Center,
Bioethical Decision-making Model
Notable because it was intended for use by students in their teenage years

Taylor,
Top Ten Questions You Should Ask Yourself When Making an Ethical Decision
Notable because it attempts to reduce the decision-making problem to a checklist

1991

Canadian Psychological Association,
CPA Code of Ethics
Notable because the procedure is an integral part of a code of ethics

1992

Ruggiero,
A Strategy for Analyzing Ethical Issues
Notable because it makes use of analog cases

Woodruff,
Ethical Dilemmas Sheet
Notable because it includes a regression step (backtracking)

1993

Schlossberger,
A Template for Moral Decision Making
Notable because the main procedure uses subprocedures, like a computer program

1994

Harmes,
Genetic Decision Making Model
Notable because it is heavily values-driven, and because it finds both the best and worst solutions

1995

Chonko,
A Framework for Ethical Decision Making
Notable for the variety of moral considerations introduced, and for its strong post-decision evaluation component

Collins and Miller,
Abbreviated Paramedic Method for Computer Professionals (new version)
Notable for its mathematical notation, for considering interactions between many situational elements, for collecting the best features from various alternatives, and for including regression steps

Dreilinger and Rice,
Ethical Decision Making in Business
Notable because it considers specific impediments to decision-making, and because it allows a decision to be modified after implementation

Kidder,
Nine Checkpoints for Ethical Decision-making
Notable for its focus on "right versus right" paradigms, and for converting dilemmas to "trilemmas"

Liffick,
Scenario Analysis Methodology
Notable for using problem-reduction strategies, for using moral analogies, and for stressing codes of ethics

MacDonald,
A Guide to Moral Decision Making
Notable for stressing moral sensitivity as a prerequisite, and for using "comfort tests" at the end

Spiceland and Sepe,
Model for Ethical Decisions
Notable because it includes all, and only, the most common steps

Thomasma,
Moral Reasoning Methodology
Notable for conceding that decision-making will be highly conflicted

van Hooft, Gillam and Byrnes,
A General Decision-making Strategy
Notable for imposing constraints on solutions, and for giving criteria a strong role

1996

American Counseling Association,
A Practitioner's Guide to Ethical Decision Making
Notable for including a regression step, for offering an early exit, for recognizing that multiple solutions may be required, and for relying heavily on the profession (colleagues, codes, literature)

American School Counselor Association,
Ethical Decision Making Model
Notable for recognizing that personal values may be in conflict with professional norms

Bivins,
Worksheet for Ethical Decision Making
Notable for requiring empathy with stakeholders, for pursuing both best- and worst-case analyses, and for a concluding adversarial defense

Hiskes and Hiskes,
Risk/Benefit Model
Notable because it is a general procedure, because it is policy-driven, and because it assigns probabilities and other mathematical values

Josephson Institute,
Ethical Decision-making Model
Notable for its compactness, for its youth-friendly approach, and for allowing one kind of value to "trump" another

Kallman and Grillo,
A Four-step Process for Ethical Analysis and Decision Making
Notable for its completeness, for focusing equally on action and inaction, for trying to prevent recurrence, and for doing what-if analysis at "pivot points"

Miller,
Questions to Aid Ethical Decision-making
Notable for its emphasis on the workplace, and for allowing competition between ethical systems

Newman and Brown,
Ethical Decision-making Flowchart
Notable for permitting regression, for considering time constraints, for providing several stop/go points, and for scrutinizing the decision-making process itself

Rahanu, Davies and Rogerson,
The Five-step Process of Ethical Analysis
Notable because it gives a role to moral intuition, and because it considers "themes" common to many of the ethical codes developed by the information professions

1997

Baase,
Scenario Analysis Methodology
Notable for distinguishing between actions that are morally required and acts that are morally acceptable but not required

Gregoire,
Ethical Decision Making
Notable because it tries to prevent the same problem from recurring, because it calls for stakeholders to participate in decision-making, and because it strives for due process in the implementation of the decision

Moulder,
Bioethical Decisionmaking Process
Notable for giving more attention to stakeholders than to anything else

Professional Engineering Practice Liaison Program,
Nine Basic Steps to Personal Ethical Decision Making
Notable for requiring review of previous cases, for requiring the development of ethical awareness before trying to make decisions, and for trying to identify the choice that "does the most good for the right reasons"

Professional Engineering Practice Liaison Program,
Guidelines for Facilitating Solutions to Ethical Dilemmas
Notable for being exclusively values-driven, for including stakeholder motivations, and for recognizing the value of outside or external assistance

Spinello,
Steps for Ethical Analysis
Notable for giving a role to moral intuition, and for considering policy implications

1998

Agapow,
Analysis of Scenarios
Notable for examining the relationships among stakeholders

Darty,
The Ethical Decision-making Process
Notable for considering whether it is necessary to take any action

Dunlap,
Ethical Decision-making Sequence
Notable for considering the consequences of doing nothing, for informing "only those involved" if action is taken, and for including a follow-up phase

Engler,
Ten-step Decision Model
Notable for the wide variety of information gathered, for requiring self-examination of values, and for doing some time management

Ethics Resource Center,
The Big PLUS in Ethical Decision Making
Notable for its strong follow-up analysis, for using the "PLUS" checklist as a subprocedure, and for including consensus-building when deciding as a team

Ethics Resource Center,
Three Quick Tests for Ethical Congruence
Notable because it provides a checklist that might be useful in exigent circumstances, when there is no time for analysis

Fitzpatrick,
An Ethical Decision Making Model
Notable for ranking facts in order of importance

Koop,
Ethical Analysis
Notable for omitting the decide-and-act step

Long,
A Rational Model of Ethical Analysis and Decision Making
Notable for its heavy reliance on rankings, and for taking steps to prevent recurrence of the same problem

Markkula Center for Applied Ethics,
A Framework for Ethical Decision Making
Notable for its emphasis on social and economic justice, for requiring wide consultation, and for including an "if I had it to do over again" reflection

McDonald,
A Framework for Ethical Decision-making
Notable for using virtue-based ethics, for warning that options are volatile (can appear or disappear during analysis), for coping effectively with time pressures, and for including "sensitivity analysis"

Searing,
The HARPS Methodology
Notable for its rigor and completeness, for flowcharting the entire decision process, for including conceptual analysis, for using effective conflict-resolution procedures, for coping with missing facts ("holes"), and for permitting backtracking

Sechowski,
Process for Structured Ethical Analysis and Decision Making
Notable for stressing planning, and for including "hindsight" (what should have been done in the first place)

Steinman, Richardson and McEnroe,
The Ethical Decision-making Process
Notable for warning against ethical traps, for forcing self-examination, and for revising proposed solutions based on feedback from advisors

1999

Black, Steele and Barney,
Journalistic Decision-making Guidelines
Notable for trying to involve people of diverse perspectives in the decision-making process

Holt Consulting Services,
Questions for Ethical Decision-making
Notable for taking an organizational approach throughout

Josephson Institute of Ethics,
Five Steps of Principled Reasoning
Notable for keeping the solution open to new information and open to change, for questioning assumptions and grounds, for its distinctive epistemic approach, and for considering whether changing goals or getting consent might avoid negative consequences

Kvanvig,
The RESOLVEDD Method
Notable for classifying consequences according to likelihood, for including future generations, and for building a defense against objections

Schaefer,
A Suggested Strategy for Ethical Decision Making
Notable for restricting the focus to only one important stakeholder and only one important value

Taylor,
Bioethical Analysis Worksheet
Notable for considering stakeholder priorities, and for trying to convince each stakeholder to accept the solution

U. S. Department of Defense,
Ethical Decision-making Plan
Notable for emerging from a source not famous for its ethics, and for eliminating solutions with short-term advantages but long-term problems