Flowchart

Gregoire, "Ethical Decision Making"

award Notable because it tries to prevent the same problem from recurring, because it calls for stakeholders to participate in decision-making, and because it strives for due process in the implementation of the decision

SOURCE FOR THE PROCEDURE

indentGregoire, Tom. "Ethical Decision Making." 1997. http://www.csw.ohio-state.edu/~gregoire/MIS/decide.htm (10 Jun. 1999). This approach may derive from the book Ethics of Information Management: The Ethical Challenge by Richard O. Mason, Florence M. Mason, and Mary J. Culnan.

THE PROCEDURE ITSELF

Disclaimer
  1. What are the facts?
    1. What information is pertinent?
    2. What are the morally relevant considerations?
    3. Who are the key actors?
    4. What actions were already taken and what were their consequences?
    5. What actions are being contemplated and what will be their consequences?
  2. What ethical principles should be applied (what ought to be)?
  3. Who should decide?
    1. Need for participation of all relevant parties.
    2. Issues of sovereignty, legitimacy and ability to affect a resolution.
      • Does a party have a duty to perform?
      • Is a party forbidden from performing?
  4. Who should benefit from the decision?
    1. What values predominate?
    2. Who has the strongest claim?
  5. How should the decision be made?
    1. Ensure due process and due respect.
    2. Establish, in advance, the specific procedures and involved parties.
    3. Is the result just or fair?
  6. What steps should be taken to prevent this issue from occurring again?

WALT'S CHECKLIST

The same checklist was applied to all procedures.
Index Page
Index